ShareThis Page

WVU football notebook: TCU pulled off surprises

| Sunday, Nov. 4, 2012, 5:50 p.m.
West Virginia safety Ishmael Banks reacts after losing to TCU on a two-point conversion catch in the second overtime Saturday at Milan Puskar Stadium in Morgantown, W.Va. TCU defeated West Virginia, 39-38. Barry Reeger | Tribune-Review
West Virginia running back Shawne Alston (20) and linebacker Terence Garvin react to losing to TCU, 39-38, Saturday in double overtime at Milan Puskar Stadium in Morgantown, W.Va. Barry Reeger | Tribune-Review
West Virginia receiver Stedman Bailey catches a touchdown in front of TCU cornerback Jason Verrett in the second overtime Saturday at Milan Puskar Stadium in Morgantown, W.Va. TCU rallied moments later to defeat the Mountaineers, 39-38. Barry Reeger | Tribune-Review
West Virginia receiver Tavon Austin eludes TCU defenders Elisha Olabode (6) and Marcus Mallet (54) to score on a 43-yard touchdown pass in the second quarter Saturday at Milan Puskar Stadium in Morgantown, W.Va. TCU won in double overtime, 39-38. Barry Reeger | Tribune-Review

MORGANTOWN, W.Va. — With West Virginia leading, 38-37, in double overtime, TCU coach Gary Patterson bypassed the extra point and went for the two-point conversion and the win.

All the Mountaineers needed was a stop.

WVU lost, 39-38, when quarterback Trevone Boykin rolled out and completed a low pass to receiver Josh Boyce in the end zone.

“From the field, I thought he caught it,” WVU coach Dana Holgorsen said. “(Replay officials) looked at it. So I guess he did.”

It was a bad sequence for the defense, which played one of its best games of the season.

Prior to the conversion, TCU surprised the Mountaineers with a trick play: Receiver Brandon Carter tossed a 25-yard touchdown to Corey Fuller — immediately after WVU's Geno Smith threw a 25-yard touchdown pass to Stedman Bailey.

“It's a trick play. They tricked us,” co-defensive coordinator Joe DeForest said. “It's like magic. We've got to do a better job of reading our keys.”

Improved pass rush

Nose tackle Shaq Rowell said he could tell the pass rush was bothering Boykin.

“A lot of hits. We must have hit him 40 times,” Rowell said. “I heard him crying. I didn't think he would finish.”

WVU recorded three sacks — 1½ each by linebackers Shaq Petteway and Josh Francis — and had Boykin on the run all game.

“We put the most pressure on a quarterback you saw all year,” Rowell said.

Young leader

Freshman safety Karl Joseph had the second-most tackles (nine, eight solo) against TCU, equaling a career high. Joseph entered the game second on the team in tackles.

On a struggling defense searching for leaders, Joseph has emerged in surprising fashion.

“It's kind of odd, but he does (lead) just by the way he plays,” said Keith Patterson, WVU's other defensive coordinator. “He instills confidence. Not only in himself but in others around him.”


Bailey's touchdown catch in the second overtime was his 15th of the season and 31st of his career. Bailey has scored a touchdown in all but two games this season. ... Tyler Bitancurt has 316 career points and improved to No. 3 on the school's career scoring list for kickers. His 52-yard field goal against TCU was a career long.

John Harris is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.