Share This Page

Secondary closes deal in Steelers' win over Giants

| Monday, Nov. 5, 2012, 12:06 p.m.
Christopher Horner
Steelers cornerback Ike Taylor intercepts an Eli Manning pass during the first half against the Giants Sunday, Nov. 4, 2012, at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, N.J. Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Steelers linebacker Lawrence Timmons and cornerback Ike Taylor takes out Giants running back Andre Brown in the third quarter Sunday, Nov. 4, 2012, at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, N.J. Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review

Keenan Lewis looked like a scrappy welterweight engaged in a gutsy bout, one accentuated with furious, perpetual exchanges of body blows with the New York Giants' slippery receivers.

The Steelers' sometimes-embattled cornerback took some shots — two pass interference penalties that totaled nearly the length of the field. But with quarterback Eli Manning trying to punch his way out of the corner, Lewis and the rest the Steelers' secondary delivered the knockout blows to secure a hard-fought 24-20 victory at MetLife Stadium on Sunday.

“What did I tell you,” a jubilant Lewis said, referring to his boast that the secondary would hold up against a quarterback with a proven record of fourth-quarter comebacks.

The Steelers' secondary — victimized in Denver, Oakland and Tennessee — made play after play to turn back the defending Super Bowl champions. Lewis had a hand in three of the Steelers' five passes defended.

Yet, cornerback Ike Taylor said the Steelers must prove they can close the deal consistently when they host the Kansas City Chiefs on “Monday Night Football.”

The league's second-ranked defense closed with a flurry in holding Manning to his fewest passing yards (125) since 2008. Manning, under siege by linebackers Lawrence Timmons and LaMarr Woodley, couldn't find his rhythm or his favorite target, Victor Cruz, who had his confidence shaken after taking a heavy shot from safety Ryan Clark.

The numbers were reflective of the Steelers' dominance over the final 15 minutes. The Giants, who entered the game with a 72-13 fourth-quarter advantage, were limited to minus-9 yards on three possessions and Manning's only third-down completion netted 1 yard.

“We're closing out the fourth quarter, which is what we weren't doing early in the season,” said Taylor, who registered his first interception. “We're finally getting around the ball a little bit.

“We kind of embraced the challenge. It was businesslike.”

The Steelers were all business despite traveling on gameday because of Hurricane Sandy. The top-ranked secondary simply overwhelmed the Giants as Taylor and Lewis patrolled the boundaries to deny Manning any good looks down field.

“Two weeks ago, we were the No. 1 big-play team in the league,” Giants coach Tom Coughlin said. “I mean it doesn't make any sense.”

The Steelers were determined to keep Cruz from doing his rhythmic Salsa dance in the end zone. While Clark faces the possibility of a fine for a hit that shocked Cruz's ribs, it was a blow that set the tone down the stretch.

The Giants' receivers make a living in the middle of the field. On Sunday, they were seemingly unwilling to challenge the Steelers with their array of skinny posts and slant routes, particularly on third down.

“It's going to take closing games out in the fourth quarter for us to continue to win,” Taylor said. “We challenged ourselves as a defense going against Eli, especially in the fourth quarter — and especially the secondary.”

Ralph N. Paulk is staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at rpaulk@tribweb.com or 412-320-7923.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.