Jeannette officials enter Monsour building with warrant
By Richard Gazarik and Amanda Dolasinski| Friday, Nov. 9, 2012, 10:28 a.m.
Jeannette officials are removing records from the abandoned Monsour Medical Center to see if the canister-like building left vacant along Route 30 more than six years ago is a hazard.
City Solicitor Scott Avolio obtained a search warrant to enter and inspect the building with a code enforcement officer and fire department officials Friday morning.
Shortly after entering the building, authorities said they found a box of patient records from 2006 when the hospital closed after a number of failed state inspections.
“There's open medical documents, patient names, dates of birth, phone numbers and Social Security numbers,” said code enfocement officer Ed Howley. “It has the illnesses they were in (the hospital) for. That can be used by identity-theft people.”
Avolio said he does not have the legal authority to remove patient records, but will inventory them and notify the state's Attorney General Office. He said that the state could contract with a private agency to remove the records and store them or destroy them.
“They have not confirmed whether they'll be able to do that yet,” Avolio said.
City officials said they were concerned that records contained confidential, personal and financial information may have been left unsecured in the buildings at the complex.
The main building is a favorite haunt of squatters and vandals. Officials said they fear that personal information of former patients could fall into the hands of identity thieves.
City officials have condemned the building, but they said the city does not have $250,000 to $1 million needed to demolish it.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has opened an investigation on how patient records were handled when Monsour closed.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.