Share This Page

Another Pennsylvania deer diagnosed with CWD

| Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2012, 8:24 p.m.

A second Pennsylvania deer has been found to have had chronic wasting disease.

A buck was found on the same captive deer farm in New Oxford, Adams County, where the state's first case of the disease was discovered. Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture officials announced the news of that first deer Oct. 11; word of the second CWD-positive deer followed Wednesday.

Eight deer from that farm that were euthanized and tested were found to be disease free. A ninth that was meant to be tested escaped.

The number of deer farms under quarantine because they have deer connected to the New Oxford facility, has climbed again.

Three farms were put under quarantine. That grew to four, then 12, then 21. On Wednesday, 27 farms in 16 counties are under quarantine, meaning that they cannot move deer on or off their sites.

Among the sites under quarantine are Hollow Tree Whitetails in Limestone and a farm in Fairmont City, both in Clarion County; Anthony Whitetail Ranch in Grampian in Clearfield County; and Freedom Whitetails and Nelson Whitetails, both in Blair County.

Bob Frye is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at bfrye@tribweb.com or 724-838-5148.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.