By The Washington Post

Published: Wednesday, November 7, 2012, 9:42 p.m.
Updated: Tuesday, February 19, 2013

TEHRAN — A sober analysis assessing the possible threat of a military confrontation over Iran's nuclear program and highlighting the benefits of negotiations to avert a deeper crisis has been published by a surprising source: Iran's Ministry of Intelligence.

The report first appeared on the ministry's website Tuesday and has been republished by various Iranian media outlets, adding to growing speculation that new negotiations with the international bloc known as the P5+1, or even direct talks with the United States, may be on the horizon.

The Intelligence Ministry is viewed as a hawkish power center within Iran's system but not a channel for expressing the Islamic republic's foreign policy views. The findings in the report suggest that the ministry has a pragmatic understanding of the challenges the country faces, the cost it is paying for continuing uranium enrichment at current levels, the threat of Israeli aggression and, perhaps most important, a way out of the stalemate.

Although the statement refers to Israel as the “Zionist regime,” it is otherwise devoid of the ideological tone that characterizes most ministry reports and that has been the Iranian norm for decades. Instead, the arguments in the 1,200-word report reflect many of the views agreed on by international advocates of a negotiated solution, namely that the potential destruction caused by strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities would set back the program by only a few years at most and that diplomacy is a preferred way forward.

Ignoring the possibility of “imminent force,” the report says, would be an “unforgivable sin.” To avoid such a military confrontation, the report advises: “One of the options is to take diplomatic and political measures and use the potentials of international bodies, which is a necessary and less costly option.”

The report, titled “Reasons and Obstacles of a Military Attack by the Zionist Regime Against Iran,” makes a clear distinction between positions on Iran's nuclear program held by the Israeli government and the U.S. administration. It says President Obama “hopes to solve this issue peacefully and through diplomacy.” It goes on to say that Obama does not think Iran's enrichment program, which Iran insists is solely for peaceful purposes, is an imminent threat.

1. Steelers quarterback Roethlisberger likes the revamped offense
2. Steelers’ Polamalu trim, fit as he arrives for OTAs
3. Kovacevic: Pens improve under microscope
4. Neal’s solid play soon could pay off on scoresheet for Penguins
5. Penguins Insider: Time is right for Jokinen’s return
6. Jefferson Hills attorney tops field for district justice
7. Steelers notebook: Less talk, more work is Tomlin’s theme
8. Endorsed school candidates prevail
9. North Versailles candidates mull options
10. ‘We did it!’ Peduto tells city, as he defeats Wagner 
11. Dunbar Township incumbent wins nomination

There are currently no comments for this story.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.