Speculation surrounds People magazine's choice for Sexiest Man Alive for 2012
By Bu Jen Chaney
Published: Sunday, Nov. 11, 2012, 8:53 p.m.
People will announce its Sexiest Man Alive for 2012 this week, forcing last year's winner, Georgetown University grad Bradley Cooper, to pass his crown of sexiness on to some other well-deserving bastion of male hotness. The website Gossip Cop recently reported that the glossy magazine has chosen Channing Tatum to serve in this crucial role. Because this is a matter of national security and newsstand sales, People has not confirmed that report. That means all we can do until Wednesday is speculate about who may soon be deemed the most alluring guy on the planet.
Look, the presidential election is over, so we have to speculate about something. Here are five contenders for the title:
Why he could be Sexies t Man Alive: That Gossip Cop item aside, this has been a breakout year for Tatum. He demonstrated his appeal this year in three important ways: by making women laugh (“21 Jump Street”), swoon (“The Vow”) and watch him take off his clothes during Ginuwine's “Pony” (“Magic Mike”).
Why he might not: He could be seen as — please pardon the “Magic Mike” double entendre — overexposed.
Robert Downey Jr.
Why he could be: A favorite of our readers, the (iron) man has a lot working in his favor. He was in the biggest blockbuster of 2012, “The Avengers,” and will reprise his role as Tony Stark next year in “Iron Man 3.” He recently became a dad for the second time, which has raised his warm-and-cuddly numbers exponentially. Plus — and this could be the factor that ultimately takes him to the top — his strutability ratings are extremely high, as demonstrated during his swagger-filled entrance into Comic-Con 2012.
Why he might not: There is really no reason, unless he just doesn't feel like having his picture taken for the People photo spread. But even that's not a deal-breaker.
Why he could be: He's starring in one of the splashier, awards-buzzy films of this holiday season, “Les Miserables,” making him a particularly timely choice. He's also the rare individual who can wear Wolverine mutton chops and still look pretty handsome.
Why he might not: He already earned the title back in 2008. Perhaps, People would not want a Jackman repeat quite so soon.
Why he could be: He's James Bond, and he's starring in “Skyfall,” which is poised to blow up big at the box office and in terms of cultural conversation.
Why he might not: His reputation as a super-serious guy might persuade People editors to opt for someone more willing to embrace his Sexiest Man status.
Why he could be: As some may recall, the committed Gosling constituency flipped out last year when Cooper got the title instead of the “Hey Girl” Messiah. Perhaps it's time to officially confirm his status as the most-desirable male among People's target demographic?
Why he might no: If People chooses him, they may come across as looking too desperate to make up for last year's perceived snub.
Jen Chaney is a staff writer for The Washington Post.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Penguins’ Orpik taken off ice on stretcher in loss to Bruins
- Steelers still have something worth playing for
- Rossi: Penguins’ Orpik among select NHLers going without gluten
- Breaking down the Pirates’ needs entering winter meetings
- Ex-Pirates great Parker’s long wait for Hall of Fame could finally end
- Robinson: Video review reveals Steelers coach’s sideline movements in Baltimore were out of character
- Investors put squeeze on prospective homeowners’ American dreams
- Rampant misuse of antibiotics poses growing global threat, experts warn
- Kovacevic: On Melancon, Mandela, molding
- Controversial Rooney Rule has opened door for NFL minority coaching candidates
- Gorman: Will Aliquippa’s Pitt pipeline end with Henry?