Butler County solicitor announces retirement
Butler County Solicitor Julie Graham announced her retirement on Tuesday.
Graham, 55, of Adams said her last day in the office will be Dec. 31, but with vacation days due her for 2013, her official retirement date will be Feb. 8.
Graham, who earns $114,000 a year, has worked for Butler County for nearly 25 years. She worked four years as a grant writer for the county Planning Commission before becoming an assistant solicitor in 1992. She became one of two county solicitors in 1994 and the sole solicitor two years later.
Graham said she wants to spend more time with her family.
Graham has found herself a target of public criticism from Democratic minority Commissioner James Eckstein since he took office in January.
In September, Eckstein signed up as a member of the public to speak during a commission meeting and argued with Graham when she said he had the same three-minute time limit to speak that everyone else does.
Last week, Graham repeatedly urged Eckstein not to discuss a defamation lawsuit filed against him by fellow Commissioner A. Dale Pinkerton, but Eckstein ignored her.
“I'm not going to kid you and say that the last year hasn't been more difficult than most,” Graham said. “I've worked under seven (boards of commissioners,) and I've never been questioned or have people not take my advice like now. That's a hard thing.”
Graham is the second high-ranking county official to retire in recent weeks. Chief clerk/director of administration Bill O'Donnell retired Nov. 2, though he will be paid as a consultant to help finish drafting the 2013 county budget. He was replaced by Amy Wilson, Pinkerton's administrative assistant.
Bill Vidonic is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-5621 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.