Former president Spanier receives pay under contract, Penn State clarifies
In this March 7, 2007, file photo, Penn State University president Graham Spanier speaks during a news conference at the Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center in Hershey, Pa.
Photo by Carolyn Kaster | Associated Press
A spokesman for Penn State University on Monday issued a statement clarifying the status of former university President Graham Spanier.
Penn State spokesman David LaTorre said Spanier remains on the university payroll at $600,000 a year and collected $700,000 on a paid sabbatical year that ended Nov. 9. He said a prior statement that Spanier was receiving no additional compensation from the university referred to his position as a tenured professor, not to payments under his contract.
Spanier, 64, headed the land grant university for 16 years and was in the first year of a five-year contract when Penn State trustees forced his resignation because of the Jerry Sandusky grand jury report last November. University officials have refused to release the terms of his separation contract, saying only that he remains a tenured university professor.
Before his ouster, Spanier's compensation package totaled $937,955, according to a university report for the year ending June 2011.
University officials placed Spanier on leave and barred him from teaching or using university offices this month when the Attorney General's Office charged him with conspiring with two administrators to conceal and lie about allegations against Sandusky.
Spanier maintains his innocence on all charges, and Penn State continues to pay his legal fees.
Sandusky, a former assistant football coach, is serving a 30- to 60-year prison sentence on his conviction for sexually abusing 10 boys in and around Penn State facilities over 15 years.
Debra Erdley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-320-7996 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.