Military-grade weapons confiscated from Newell home
Police said they would like to talk to a Newell man about illegal explosives and firearms that officers said they found in his home.
Southwest Regional Police Chief John Hartman said officers served a search warrant at about 11:30 a.m. Monday for a house at 102 Miller St., owned by Jeff Wilson.
Hartman said Wilson is about 57 years old and lived alone in the house, where “military-grade and industrial-grade explosives,” a rifle, boxes of ammunition and a dagger were confiscated.
Police received information about the house while working on a burglary investigation, he said.
“I don't know that they're not related,” Hartman said.
A full inventory listing what was removed from the home was not immediately available Monday evening, he said.
The Allegheny County bomb squad removed the suspected explosives, Hartman said.
An evacuation of nearby homes was not necessary because the items were contained in a below-ground basement.
Wilson was not there when the warrant, issued by Belle Vernon District Judge Jesse Cramer, was served, Hartman said.
Hartman said no charges or warrants have been filed for Wilson.
Police cleared the scene at about 6 p.m. Monday, Hartman said.
Newell Volunteer Fire Department and Brownsville Ambulance Service were dispatched to the scene on standby in case of any injuries, but no one was harmed, Hartman said.
“There were other items of interest in that house that we are currently investigating,” Hartman said.
Stacey Federoff is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-836-6660.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.