Hempfield sex offender won't remain jailed
A Hempfield man was sentenced Tuesday to serve nearly a year in jail for exposing himself to five middle school students more than two years ago.
But David Scott Perkins, who was released on bail after he pleaded guilty to sex offenses in August, won't spend any more time behind bars.
“It would be counterproductive to put you back in jail,” said Westmoreland County Judge Debra A. Pezze.
Perkins, 28, pleaded guilty to charges in three separate incidents on Nov. 17, 2010. Police said Perkins exposed himself to girls near the Jeannette McKee Elementary/Middle School, in the middle school parking lot and at a bus stop in the Fort Allen section of Hempfield.
Several of the girls told police they saw Perkins make obscene gestures and masturbate as he drove by them.
According to court records, Perkins initially denied the allegations but later tearfully admitted to the crimes. He told police it “gave him a thrill” to perform the acts in front of girls.
Perkins initially was charged with 31 offenses, but as part of a plea deal agreed to in August, the prosecution withdrew all but two felony counts of open lewdness and a misdemeanor offense of corruption of a minor.
Pezze sentenced Perkins to serve one year, less a day, to two years, less a day, in jail and an additional three years on probation. Perkins was given credit for the 20 months he served in jail before August.
Perkins will be required to register his whereabouts with the state police under Megan's Law.
Rich Cholodofsky is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-830-6293 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.