Team Dusseldorf wins game at Polo for the Kids
“Go Ligonier! Go Ligonier!”
The chant echoed from the children's activity tent during Polo for the Kids, held Saturday at the Richard E. Raizman Memorial Polo Field in Cook.
The youthful enthusiasm was appropriate, given that the event benefits children's scholarships at the Ligonier Valley YMCA.
The tried-and-true schedule included the opening parade of hounds from the Rolling Rock Hunt, led by huntsman Mark Stickley; the promenade of country-chic fashions along the sideline; plentiful food and drink; the halftime stomping of the divots; and, not incidentally, the excitement of the annual match between teams Ligonier and Dusseldorf.
Astride the ponies for Team Ligonier were Mark Powers, Justin Powers, Juliette Powers, Ken Fawcett and Mark Corradino.
Riding for the ultimately victorious Team Dusseldorf were Mike Groubert, Patrick Teroerde, Glenn Watterson, Glenn Watterson Jr., Dominic Gwyn-Jones and Andres Torres.
Calling the play-by-play was Coy Gupta.
Seen from the event committee were Dorothy Raizman, Fritz and Ulla Teroerde, Kris Samloff, Catherine Baxter Smith, Nancy Everson, Ben Wright and Scotty Nelson.
Under the tents wereSophie Mellon, Christina Henderson, Mark Robertshaw, Pat Wallace and Kim Dickert Wallace, Jim and Mary Louise Silvis, Tom Smith, Carol Wright, Charles III and Stephanie Fagan, Bert O'Neill, Terry Graft and Linda Brown and Don and Kim Kramer.
Also, the Rev.Bob Cummings, Karl andBridget Horman, Joe andConnie Vella, George and Sue Welty, Doug and Jennifer Welty, Kristin Wilkins, Mary Matson, Priscilla Chavez, Ian Burkland, Gloria Eisaman, Pauline Douglas, Dee Gano and Barbara Ramm.
— Shirley McMarlin
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.