Tea raises funds for Blackburn Center
Blackburn Center education specialist, Cindy Karstaedt, (center), joins Lay Life Mission Committee co-chairs, Ellie Bridge, (L), and Stephanie Albaugh, (R), at the tea to benefit the Blackburn Center Against Domestic and Sexual Violence in Greensburg, held at the Christ United Church of Christ in Latrobe on Sunday afternoon, September 16, 2012.
Photo by Kim Stepinsky | For The Tribune-Review
A tea to benefit the Blackburn Center Against Domestic and Sexual Violence was held Sept. 16 in Christ United Church of Christ in Latrobe.
Member Ellie Bridge of Latrobe said she developed a heart for clients of the Greensburg-based organization years back when she helped staff its crisis hotline. Later, when the church's Lay Life Mission Committee was looking for a local mission to support, she thought it would be a natural fit.
The recent tea, the eighth hosted at the church, featured one table laden with finger sandwiches and cookies and another holding silent auction gift baskets. Guests also could purchase an array of mouth-watering desserts to take home. Cheesecake, anyone?
Guest speaker was Blackburn Center education specialistCindy Karstaedt.
Providing musical entertainment, in the form of show tunes and sacred songs, wereMolly Richards, Laurie Richards, Dawna Bates and the Rev.Augie Twigg. The quartet represented the Bethany Players of Bethany United Methodist Church of Latrobe.
Stephanie Albaugh served with Bridge as tea co-chairwoman. Committee members included Deb Stahl, Carolyn Stutzman, Alice Harr, Pam George and Elena Sillaman.
Also present were Ellie's hubby Joe and their son, the Rev.David Bridge, along withOra Dalton, Ellen Sautter, Karen McCullough, Ruth Campbell, Toni Straka, Paula Sucanic, Allison Luke, Connie Knupp, Stacie Knupp, MJ Knupp, Richard andSusan O'Donnell, Linda Nace and Tracy Brubaker.
— Shirley McMarlin
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.