Warm climate or cold, heart deaths rise in the winter
It doesn't matter whether you live in Los Angeles or in Massachusetts, you're more likely to die of a heart-related problem such as heart attack, heart failure or stroke when the weather is (relatively) cold.
Researchers looked at death records from seven different United States locations — L.A, Massachusetts, Texas, Arizona, Georgia, Washington and Pennsylvania — and found a consistent pattern “across the board,” says Dr. Robert Kloner, a cardiologist at the Heart Institute at Good Samaritan Hospital in Los Angeles and a collaborator in a study presented Wednesday at the American Heart Association's Scientific Sessions 2012.
In the sites the team surveyed, it found a 26 percent to 36 percent increase in circulatory deaths in winter compared with summer and early fall.
“This was surprising because climate was thought to be the primary determinant of seasonal variation in death rates,” Dr. Bryan Schwartz, the lead author of the study, said in a statement.
Kloner says the results suggested that people acclimatize to the conditions where they live, and that factors beyond temperature — including higher rates of flu infection, less-healthful lifestyles in winter months, and higher rates of depression when the weather takes a turn for the worse — could be important in determining when deaths occur during a typical year.
Much of Kloner's work focuses on triggers of cardiovascular events, he added, noting that there are many triggers of heart problems beyond the chronic-risk factors that often come to mind, such as high blood pressure, diabetes and smoking. Heart problems escalated after the 6.7-magnitude Northridge earthquake in January 1994, for instance, and after the L.A. Rams' Super Bowl loss to the Pittsburgh Steelers in January 1980.
The holiday season also seems to affect health in Los Angeles, Kloner says.
— The Los Angeles Times
Study finds drop in heart attacks with smoke-free law
A decline in heart attacks in one Minnesota county appears to be linked to smoke-free workplace laws, according to a new report in Archives of Internal Medicine, a JAMA Network publication.
According to a release from the journal, which published the study online last week, exposure to secondhand smoke is associated with coronary heart disease in non-smokers, and research suggests that the cardiovascular effects of secondhand smoke are nearly as large as those with active smoking.
Richard D. Hurt, a Mayo Clinic physician, and his Mayo colleagues in Rochester, Minn., evaluated the incidence of heart attack and sudden cardiac death in Olmsted County, Minn., during the 18-month period before and after implementation of smoke-free ordinances. In 2002, a smoke-free restaurant ordinance was implemented and, in 2007, all workplaces, including bars, became smoke free.
“We report a substantial decline in the incidence of (heart attack) from 18 months before the smoke-free restaurant law was implemented to 18 months after the comprehensive smoke-free workplace law was implemented five years later,” the authors comment, according to the journal's release.
When comparing the 18 months before implementation of the smoke-free restaurant ordinance with the 18 months after implementation of the smoke-free workplace law, heart attack incidence declined 33 percent from about 150.8 to 100.7 per 100,000 population, and the incidence of sudden cardiac death declined 17 percent from 109.1 to 92 per 100,000 population.
— Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Ex-Penguins defenseman Niskanen still miffed by coaches’ firings
- Starkey: Chryst a miserable failure at Pitt
- New York farmers lament lost opportunity for gas riches
- Banged-up Steelers can clinch with win over Chiefs
- Police investigate alleged institutional sexual assault at Pine youth treatment center
- Energy sector adjusts to global oil plummet
- Warning about cop-killer came moments too late
- Kids treated to gifts, peaceful holiday party at Lincoln-Lemington church
- Pitt football fights to overcome steppingstone status
- U.S. coal mines nearing record low in worker deaths
- Pitt players support Rudolph for job