ShareThis Page

Dormont theater screens 'Christmas in Compton'

| Sunday, Nov. 18, 2012, 8:50 p.m.
Susan Burig and Paula Gregg during Christmas in Compton Screening at the Hollywood Theater in Dormont on Friday, November 16, 2012. Mike Mancini | For the Tribune Review
Lynn Settles, Charlie Batch and LaTasha Batch during during Christmas in Compton Screening at the Hollywood Theater in Dormont on Friday, November 16, 2012. Mike Mancini | For the Tribune Review

“It's been a whirlwind month!” exclaimed Paula Gregg during the red-carpet premiere of “Christmas in Compton,” a film she co-produced with Susan Burig. “We had the L.A. premiere last week. ... It's starting to sink in.”

Rubberneckers caused a slight scene outside of the Hollywood Theater Dormont, where sports deities from the Penguins, Pirates and Steelers were making their way in, including Charlie Batch, who was immediately accosted by fans before reuniting with his wife, LaTasha, and mother, Lynn Settles. Meanwhile, inside, theater manager Ben Prisbylla and board member Kahmeela Adams were awaiting the sold-out crowd that included cast members Miguel Nunez, Porscha Coleman and Omar Gooding.

Filmed entirely in Compton, Calif., the story focuses on a father and son who are joined by members of the community to save their Christmas tree lot after a deal gone sour.

“They told us we'd never get it into the theaters, and we did,” Gregg added.

Proceeds of the night's raffle benefited local foundations and the Red Cross, in support of Hurricane Sandy victims.

Kate Benz is the social columnist for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at or 412-320-8515.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.