Take time to talk; the lost art of conversation
By Michael O'Hare
Published: Thursday, Oct. 4, 2012, 9:03 p.m.
Conversation is an art, but sometimes, I fear that it may be a lost art.
I can't claim to have ever been all that artistic at it, and it seems these days, there is little opportunity to practice the kind of conversation to which I refer.
Even the pros on TV's so-called talk shows seem to rush whatever the conversation might be and every participant is going for the best “sound bite.” Ouch.
I have had what were, for me, some good conversations in my life, but I have to say that most of them were when I was in my 20s with coworkers in my fledgling years in this newspaper business, or even earlier, when I was in college.
College years provide the ground for good conversations, because, at that point in our lives, we are exploring and hoping to be educated. We knew— mistakenly most likely — everything there was to know about the folks we had just spent 12 years of elementary and high school with, so in college we were alert to find out what others of our age were all about. There had to be mysteries out there.
We were, to put it simply, much like sponges hoping to soak up every bit of life that was on offer. (Note: That's a key to good conversation.)
I remember one college-days conversation more for its impact it made on me than for exactly what was said.
The long, slow talk was with my friend Wayne, a fellow student in theater arts at the Pittsburgh Playhouse. We were sitting at a Formica table in a nearby lunch place and were discussing violence, in general, and how its appearance on TV and film had negatively affected our society. Ah, to be a freshman again!
Indeed, it was a pretty lofty subject for two college newcomers, but one that I relished discussing. Wayne had grown up on the North Side of Pittsburgh, attended Perry High, where he played football and had been stationed with the Army in Germany. I had not left the Pittsburgh area for any length of time so I didn't bring much experience to the dialogue.
His point in our talk — simply put — was that violence on TV or the big screen was detrimental to our society, promoting more violence. I argued I had seen a lot of violence on TV and film, and did not think it had affected me.
And, he just matter-of-factly said that it was because of my upbringing. He had insight, he knew.
The point may seem minor, but, at the time, it touched me deeply. There I was, 19 years old, and it was the first time I had considered what seemed to me a profound truth in my life. And, I was learning not to judge everyone by the same yardstick. I was seeing how to be objective; a good lesson for a would-be actor, and a lesson that was to benefit me in this business.
Such conversations have no conclusions, yet they move you to a different place. That one did for me.
I like discussing philosophy, but get little opportunity these day; perhaps, some people feel it requires a more learned approach, but aren't we all entitled to discuss philosophy, our theories of life inasmuch as we all are alive?
In my early reporting years, I was caught up reading the work of existentialist writers, such as Jean-Paul Satre, and his view of the absurdity of things interested me. I had a long rambling talk about it with a co-worker and a first-time visitor to the area who accompanied us while we sat having drinks and listening to jazz in a Pittsburgh night club. I was still young enough to want to sound wise; now I am old enough not to try. But, I must have made some sort of impact on the guy because a year or so afterward, he called me from jail in some city (having had an operator track down my number). He asked me whether I remembered him (I did), and if I had any advice for him. He just wanted to talk; or, maybe, he was just looking for someone to make his bail.
We have all sorts of conversations in our lives, from quick talks with a clerk at a checkout to deeper talks with dear family or friends. The late writer Kurt Vonnegut used to talk about how he liked to leave his New York City home and trek several blocks to the post office. His wife pointed out he could get his stamps without leaving home, but he said he would miss his talks with the window clerk at the P.O.
For me, the best conversations are those deep and rambling talks that follow dinner or sharing late-evening drinks or in the morning over coffee when there is no hurry to get anywhere or do anything else.
Those sessions are hard to come by. I haven't had one in a while.
So, I read.
Another late, great writer, C.S. Lewis is quoted as having said: “We read to know we are not alone.”
Meandering appears Fridays. To share your thoughts on this column (or on most anything) with Mike O'Hare, write to the Leader Times, P.O. Box 978, Kittanning, PA 16201 or via e-mail to email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Analysis: Kesler remains on Penguins’ radar as Shero looks bring back ‘Big 3’ formula
- Starkey: Steelers know when to say goodbye
- ‘Un-American’? That’s Harry Reid, the Senate’s lowly smear artist
- Pirates’ big risk with pitch-heavy draft focus might soon pay off
- With so many needs, Steelers can ill afford to miss in draft
- Penguins GM Shero’s deadline deals: Addition by subtraction
- Ex-Colts executive Polian: Approach free agency with caution
- IUP students have raucous early St. Patrick’s Day celebration
- Steelers defense doesn’t make the grade in 2013 review
- Swiss ballet company’s performance emotional, energetic
- Air force chief: Malaysia jet may have turned back