Living with Children: Underachieving 17-year-old needs wake-up call
By John Rosemond
Published: Monday, Feb. 11, 2013, 9:34 p.m.
Q uestion: Our 17-year-old is a highly spoiled underachiever. As a junior in high school, he's failing two classes and borderline in the rest. We know that his problems are largely a result of our parenting style. We read your book on teens and have made progress, but we're feeling a sense of urgency. We're ready to do some drastic things. Where do you think we should start?
Answer: As you now realize, your son is in dire need of a major wake-up call. Start by stripping his room down to bare essentials, taking away any and all electronic devices, and suspending all of his privileges, including driving.
Inform him that his normal life will be restored when he has improved his grades to no less than what he's capable of and he sustains the improvement for eight weeks. Anything less will invite cursory improvement, then backsliding. You could get stuck in that sort of manipulative back-and-forth forever.
Unfortunately, this is an eleventh-hour action. Obviously, the earlier parents intervene in a problem, the better the prognosis. On the other hand, it's better to do something late than to never do anything at all. At this point, there's a lot of history (and momentum) behind your son's motivation issues.
Getting him to turn himself around is going to require a unified front and calm, purposeful resolve. Don't expect to see consistent progress for at least six weeks. Keep the faith, stay the course, and be fully prepared for things to get worse before they begin getting better.
“Why is that, John?”
Because, when parents finally pull the rug of overindulgence out from under an underachieving child, the typical reaction is full collapse along with complaints from the child to the effect that, because he has no privileges, he now has nothing to care about; therefore, he is not going to do anything to bring up his grades until certain privileges are restored.
Believe me, this is nothing more than manipulative self-drama soap opera, with a heavy dose of attempted hostage-taking thrown in. It's an attempt to get the parents to question their judgment and begin negotiating.
“Will you give me my cellphone back if I bring my grades up for a week?” or, “If you give me my cellphone and driving privileges back, I'll bring my grades up, I promise.”
Don't do it!
If your son begins making promises of that sort, don't believe a word he says. Simply smile and tell him that if he can bring his grades up for a week, he can surely bring them up for two weeks, then three, then eight.
Keep reminding him that you're not asking him to do any more than he is capable of. If you give him even the proverbial inch, he will think he can make you give up the proverbial mile. In no time, you'll be right back where you started from, but he will know that he can beat you at your own game.
So, don't play games. Go into this fully prepared for backlash of one sort or another. His reaction is likely to include anger, self-pity and threats of running away or other equally silly things. This is your golden opportunity to get control of your relationship with your son. Given that he's 17, it may be your last opportunity. Don't blow it.
Family psychologist John Rosemond answers parents' questions on his website at www.rosemond.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.