In-law called woman's ex-boss to get the dirt on why she was fired
By Carolyn Hax
Published: Thursday, Feb. 14, 2013, 11:32 a.m.
Adapted from a recent online discussion.
D ear Carolyn:
A few years ago, I was fired from a job. I was young and foolish and did something I am not proud of, and paid the price. I truly feel sorry for my actions. I spent time in therapy, and am in a much better place now.
I was embarrassed by the reason I was fired, and told people to whom I wasn't close only that I was let go.
Among those were my in-laws; we're not close. But my mother-in-law needed to know more. She called my former boss (whom she had never met), forced the story out of him, then told her gossipy prayer-circle group and anyone else who would listen. She also petitioned to my husband what a horrible liar I was, and that if he wanted out of this marriage, all he had to say was “yes.”
My husband, who knew the true story, told her he was happy in his marriage, and that was that. He's shocked at what his mother did, but doesn't seem angry, and says it's just her nature to be in the middle of everything.
I can barely look her in the face. Yes, I lied. I'm not proud of it. But was it my duty to tell every person I know the reasons behind my firing? I've never confronted her about this.
I count two problems.
1. Your mother-in-law is a hydra.
2. Your husband is a wuss (a common hydra byproduct).
Whether you stole a stapler or embezzled funds, your mother-in-law had no business digging, much less sharing the treasure she unearthed. (I believe the boss was unethical in sharing that information, but I'll leave that to workplace experts.)
Start with No. 2, and air to your husband your frustration that his mom crossed several boundaries to be overtly hateful to you — and, yet, everyone's back to business as usual. If he's not as upset as you are about this, then say why you want more of his support. Actions this egregious against a child's spouse often cost parents their relationship with said child, for good reason; will he issue her that warning in your defense? Enforce it?
You have the right to face the hydra yourself, but let your husband know you're doing it first. Explain that you're giving him a chance to say whether he supports your doing that. Weigh his preference carefully, then do what you need to do.
Should you choose that route, stick to a simple argument: You make no excuses for your past mistake, but you find her snooping into your private business, then sharing it far and wide, to be a decency violation of its own that you find difficult to forgive.
But you will try, because you love her son. Will she back him as well, by behaving more kindly to you?
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.