Share This Page

Pittsburgh Proud

"I'm so nervous," said Dr. Greg Gallik, who was preparing to accept the Pittsburgh Proud award Saturday on behalf of Community Human Services during the Allegheny County Medical Society Foundation Gala and Community Awards celebration. "I've been practicing my speech all week."

"I made him watch 'The King's Speech' for pointers!" chimed in Joe King, who was one of nearly 400 guests swarming into the Omni William Penn for the Pittsburgh Proud-themed soiree.

Inside the Urban Room, Dr. Terence Starz, Dr. Donald Yealy, Dr. Margaret Morton, Dr. Robert Cicco, Mary "Dee" Delaney and Karen Wolk Feinstein rounded out the list of honorees that were being lauded for their commitment to quality health care.

"It was a pleasant surprise," said Physician Volunteer awardee Dr. Graham Johnstone. "When you're volunteering, you're just volunteering. You're not doing it for awards."

While the Cadillac Jazz Trio added the ambiance to a lengthy cocktail hour, outgoing medical society prez Dr. Leo McCafferty was spied passing the gavel to Dr. Rajiv Varma during a special VIP champagne reception. Meanwhile, Dr. George Buerger, Dr. Kris Gopal, Dr. Sung Kim, Dr. JoAnn Narduzzi, Dr. Abolhassan Panahandeh, Dr. Siroos Samadani and Dr. Ronald Zimmerman were among this year's class receiving their pin as 50-year awardees.

Providing grants for charitable, scientific, literary and educational projects to promote high-quality medical care in the community, the Allegheny County Medical Society Foundation has granted more than $2.3 million since its inception in 1960. The evening benefited the society's medical scholarship funds and the Community College of Allegheny County nursing and health student scholarship fund.

Photo Galleries

Pittsburgh Proud Gala

Pittsburgh Proud Gala

The Pittsburgh Proud Gala at the Omni William Penn on Saturday, March 24, 2012.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.