A Night in the Woods
Being barefoot and running through the woods might constitute a typical Saturday night somewhere out in the boondocks, but for the crowd of socials gathered at the Beechwood Nature Reserve in Fox Chapel, it was the perfect opportunity to kick the stilettos to the curb and take a good old-fashioned breath of fresh air.
“We turned the heat down just a little bit, so it's comfortable ... we know nature,” joked Audubon Society of Western Pennsylvania executive director Jim Bonner (with Leslie).
So picturesque was the ASWP's A Night in the Woods party that even the lightning bugs entertained as if on cue, where more than 200, including event chairs Sarah Stallings, Becca Ringham Myerburg, and Libby Ernharth (with Steve, Mike and Johannes, respectively), were finding that the 134 acres and fi ve miles of trails were just too much temptation not to explore.
Hootini's in hand, the whimsy continued on the pathway to the Beechwood pond, which was lined with fairy houses created by local artists who were given explicit instructions to use only twigs, bark, leaves, stones, or anything else that's nature-made.
“I've never worked in the fairy genre,” confessed Peter Johnson. “It was challenging.”
“I had to Google what a fairy house meant,” added Mia Tarducci Henry. “Although, I think the idea of having art in a natural setting is a wonderful idea.”
Spotted in the great outdoors were ASWP board prexy Sally and Bob Tarhi, Nancy and Dan Fales, MarilynEisengart, Anne Ringham, Jennifer Young, Josie and Gaston Oria, Patty and Sean Casey, Tingle and Richard Barnes, Jackie Dixon, Randy Grossman, Jane and Bud Kahn, Jolie Schroeder, Julie and DavidRost, Carrie Casey and Bill Leemhuis, Naomi and Jason Sperry andSusan and Ted Wilkes.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.