Share This Page

Canine lovers take a Paws to Celebrate at Fox Chapel Golf Club

| Sunday, Dec. 23, 2012, 9:00 p.m.
Tom Flynn and Judy Myers with 'Soloman' at the Fox Chapel Golf Club for 'Paws To Celebrate' Sunday, December 16, 2012. Philip G. Pavely | Tribune-Review
Augie and Lori Barrante with 'Harlan II' at the Fox Chapel Golf Club for 'Paws To Celebrate' Sunday, December 16, 2012. Philip G. Pavely | Tribune-Review
Joseph Leckenby with 'Inga' at the Fox Chapel Golf Club for 'Paws To Celebrate' Sunday, December 16, 2012. Philip G. Pavely | Tribune-Review

Unwavering discipline, steadfast loyalty, elite training ... and a cold, wet nose.

No better way to sum up the Canine Companions for Independence, five of which were making the rounds among the likes of Judy Myers, Courtney andTim Borntraeger, Tom Flynn, Lori andAugie Barrante, Sara Scaife, and Sally Wiggin during Paws to Celebrate, held Dec. 16 at the Fox Chapel Golf Club.

Canine Companions for Independence, the largest assistance-dog organization in the world, is run by a dedicated team of volunteer trainers and professionals who work in tandem to enhance the lives of adults and kids with disabilities by providing them with an assistance dog (and ongoing support) free of charge.

“These dogs just bring magic into these people's lives,” said Peggy Douglass (withJim).

Mastering upward of 40 commands, their repertoire includes knowing how to turn lights on and off, open and close doors and drawers, and pick up dropped objects — not to mention mastering the whole “best friends” thing. For Kim andJulie Leckenby, the bond their son Joseph shares with his dog Inga was instantaneous.

“Being an only child, it's the joy of having a best friend to play with. They're inseparable,” Julie said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.