ShareThis Page

2013 Carnegie Science Awards announced

| Sunday, Feb. 3, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Bruce Smith, Charles Kulig, Carolyn Vallecorsa and Mark DeSantis during the Carnegie Science Awards reception at the Carnegie Science Center on Wednesday, January 30, 2013. Mike Mancini | For the Tribune Review
Ron Baillie, Ann Metzger and Shelley Bridarolli during the Carnegie Science Awards reception at the Carnegie Science Center on Wednesday, January 30, 2013. Mike Mancini | For the Tribune Review

“(These are) the role models for the next generation of scientists,” said Ron Baillie as he and fellow Henry Buhl Jr. co-director of Carnegie Science CenterAnn Metzger introduced the winners of the 2013 Carnegie Science Awards on Wednesday.

Pre-game for the main event in May, the reception lauded “the superlative few,” including Mark Buccilli, Peter Lucas, Jennifer DiPasquale, Nancy Minshew, David Vorp, Patrick Daly and Elaine Houston.

“For young people, if you're in the business of science, the world is yours,” said kWantera Inc. CEO Mark DeSantis, snagging the Information Technology Award.

“We just happen to be the oldest ones at our company,” mused his colleague, Carolyn Vallecorsa. “(We're) the old samples.”

Also among the crowd was Emerging Female Scientist Awardee Dr. Tracy Cui, who offered some advice to young women looking to pursue a career in the sciences.

“There's nothing intimidating about science ... it's all about curiosity. They shouldn't be afraid to look for the answers,” she said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.