Carnegie Library's Late Night social takes on a French twist
Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh ensured that all of the 500 in attendance during its Late Night social broke the cardinal rules of hushed etiquette on Friday, keeping its doors open at the main branch for another round of After Hours @the Library.
“It's very cool,” said Nate Phillips. “We live up the street, and actually just discovered the library ...”
“Well, the fact that they had events like this!” his fiancee, Sara Patterson, clarified.
A sellout a week in advance, the event took on a French twist with absinthe tastings and the occasional beret, “They were gifts ... at Christmas, we thought, ‘What are we going to do with these?'” laughed Elizabeth Sapp, who was joined by Chris Sasada, Beth Vrbanic and Michael Sapp. Elsewhere, students from the Pittsburgh Ballet Theatre came ensembled in their Moulin Rouge wear and posed for photo ops while a ballerina hair bar catered to aspiring Bun Heads.
Later, docents led groups into the library's William R. Oliver Special Collections Room, a treasure trove of rare and unique materials including books, manuscripts, personal papers and historic photographs.
“I think it's a surprise to some, but once they start coming (to the socials), they really get into it,” offered archivist Greg Priore.
Also spotted amongst the crowd were CLP prexy Mary Frances Cooper, new deputy director Susan Banks, and PBT company dancers Casey Taylor and Gabrielle Thurlow.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.