Pittsburgh's Heart Ball pulses to a flamenco beat
Given the Corazon de Fuego theme of the American Heart Association's Heart Ball on Saturday, it felt only right that, at some point, the gauntlet would be thrown down as a challenge for guests to flamenco their way onto the dance floor.
“Get out there,” Bob Pompeani instructed his captive audience of 875 as he emceed the evening with Susan Koeppen.
Not many takers in the crowd at the David L. Lawrence Convention Center, although they were willing to show off some bold moves in the fashion department.
“My husband said, ‘Are you really going to wear that feather thing?' and I said, ‘Yes, yes I am!'” commented Mariah Klinefelter of her whimsical fascinator of red and gold.
Elsewhere, red trumped all, led by an elegant lace stunner from Kathleen O'Brien (her husband, Morgan, was the honorary chair), while Linda Valenzi (with Larry Michalski) opted for an elegant white off-the-shoulder gown with gold accents.
Inside the ballroom, scarlet curtains parted to reveal a seductive atmosphere apropos of the evening, thanks to Shelly Tolo with a floral assist from Hens and Chicks. “Very much the flamenco feel,” she offered, while Jon Banuelos serenaded with his Spanish guitar.
Amongst the 900 guests in the crowd were Mary Ann Scully Excellence in Nursing awardee Lori Massaro, and Peter J. Safar Pulse of Pittsburgh awardee Dr.Ronald Pellegrini, Drs. Srinivas Murali and Marie Baldisseri, Dr. George Magovern Jr., with Jamie, Dr.Donald Fischer and the Hon. Nora Barry Fischer, Jill and Bob Sandilla, Rick andLinda Shaw, Sherri Stitt, Charlie andLatasha Batch, Bob and Leslie Nutting, Kim and Curt Fleming, Nicole Sapio, Debbie Frick-Watts and Amy Heinl.
The ball raised a whopping $1.3 million.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.