Share This Page

Animal Rescue League gala grows in popularity

| Sunday, March 3, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Dan Rossi, Tim McVay, David Bush and Ava Lanche during Animal Rescue League’s 2nd annual B*itches Ball in celebration of World Spay Day at Cruze on Tuesday, February 26, 2013. Mike Mancini | for the Tribune Review
Iliana Cherniss, Karissa Miller, and Barton French pose with Zoey the dog during Animal Rescue League’s 2nd annual B*itches Ball in celebration of World Spay Day at Cruze on Tuesday, February 26, 2013. Mike Mancini | for the Tribune Review

Patience proved to be a virtue for those awaiting entree into Cruze on Feb. 26, thanks to a line that snaked its way onto Smallman Street and a downpour that tried (but failed) to be a deterrent for the 500-plus descending on theAnimal Rescue League's B*tches Ball.

“Last year, we had about 200 people, so it's grown tremendously,” said marking director Ann Yeager.

The atmosphere of the party resembled that of a snow globe — shake it up and see what happens. “A lot more fun than most,” said Joe Vater, who was one of many alongside Judy Krause, Barton French, Marla andJohn Zerrer, Tim McVay andDavid Bush, Bill Chisnell, Jim Sheppard, Jared Pascoe and Levi Hahn.

“The first year we did it, the staff came to me with the concept, and I said, ‘Ah, I don't know. … Pittsburgh may not be ready for this.' (But) no regrets at all. The focus of this is to raise awareness for spaying and neutering. … If we can get one more animal spayed or neutered, it's a success,” said executive director Dan Rossi.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.