NEED Benefit Dinner lauds 50 years of promoting higher education
Photo by Jasmine Goldband | Tribune-Review
Much was being celebrated during the 50th Annual NEED Benefit Dinner at the Wyndham Grand on March 14, where this year's class of scholarship recipients was being lauded for their outstanding academic achievements and pursuit of a higher education.
“It makes me feel like I've had a big accomplishment,” said Propel Andrew High School senior Tamara Butler, who will attend Clarion University in the fall.
Since 1963, the organization has been providing African-American youths with scholarships to further its mission of “Unlocking the Power of Education.” Over the past half-century, more than 19,000 kids have benefited.
Child advocate and author Steve Pemberton did the honors as the evening's guest speaker. A ward of the state during his formative years, Pemberton's determination to rise above laid the foundation for an inspiring rags-to-riches story, living proof of what can be accomplished when you don't pay much heed to the odds.
“I'm very excited. I think he's going to have a lot of good advice for the scholars and their parents,” said Lara Washington, who co-chaired the evening with Evan Frazier.
Amongst the 525 in attendance were interim prexy Claudette Lewis, board chairwoman Candi Castleberry-Singleton, Rhonda Pace and her daughter, Stephanie Pace (Rhonda's husband and Stephanie's father was the late Sylvester Pace, who was remembered for his tenure as NEED prez from 2000-12.), the Rev. Dorsey McConnell, Seldon Whitaker Jr., Pete Mendes, Eustace andShelley Uku, TiAnda Blount, and Sean Gray.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.