'Happily Ever Laughter' has 'em rolling in the aisles at Pittsburgh Public Theater
Steel City welcomed The Second City to the Pittsburgh Public Theater on Aug. 23 for an SRO performance of “Happily Ever Laughter,” and for two hours the nonstop laughter echoed through the Cultural District. Well, up and down Penn Avenue, at the very least.
“In honor of our visit, we'll actually be putting ketchup on our hot dogs,” may be the company's only line for a family newspaper. Fans seated at cabaret tables that ringed the stage of the O'Reilly Theater became fodder for the troupe's hilarious, but naughty, improv schticks that hit the mark every time. And their take on Tennessee Williams' “Glass Menagerie” was a flat-out laugh riot!
Remember, this is Chicago's famed comedy theater that launched the careers of Tina Fey, John Belushi and Dan Aykroyd.
Afterward, a committee of young, hot numeros, co-chaired by Bear Brandegee and Nir Kossovsky with Molly and Kevin O'Brien, staged Laughter After Dark, a retro-glam fundraiser for the Public Theater with a “Mad Men” vibe.
Some 175 guests frolicked past formal fashions, pillbox hats, fedoras and accessories from the '60s that were playfully showcased in PPT's upstairs lounge and rehearsal hall. They also rocked to the deejayed sounds of the '60s and nibbled on deviled eggs, cocktail franks and penny candy.
Hobnobbing with Second City's talented cast at the party were such as Ted Pappas; PPT prez Mike Ginsberg and Cathy; Melanie Querry and Andreas Beck; Nikol and Dr. Stan Marks; Kerry Parker; Linda and Tony Bucci with daughter Cari Bucci Hulings (she's preggers!); Kerry Parker and Pitt Coach Barry Rohrssen; Colleen and David O'Brien; Carol Shriber; Dr. Richard Moriarty and David Hairhoger; Erin andRyan McKenna; Alessandra Basso andRobert Heaps.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.