Pittsburgh Fashion Story features vintage looks
Quite the go-around on Sept. 13 to see who among the leading men of Pittsburgh Fashion Story were up for a stroll down a catwalk set up in the Power Center Ballroom of Duquesne University.
“I'm not gonna do that!” said emcee Paul Steigerwald. “Maybe when I lose 20 pounds.”
“I don't have any skills ... this guy has the experience,” said John Lamberson of his PFS co-creator Doug Tjelmeland, a former model.
“I'm getting old, though. I need a walker,” came Tjelmeland's immediate response.
Moments of humility notwithstanding, the 10th annual fashion show benefiting Partners For Quality's Allegheny Children's Initiative filled a majority of the seats in anticipation of looks from area retail therapists including e.b. Pepper, Kristi Boutique, Charles Spiegel for Men, Threadz Boutique, and Roberta Weissburg Leathers.
“I'm a virgin ... sort of,” confessed first-timer and Eon's Fashion Antique owner Richard Parsakian as he put the finishing touches on a series of sleek vintage looks from the 1930s, '40s and '50s. Also a new kid on the block, Lawrenceville's glitteR & gRit made its presence known via a handful of dreamy bridal gowns that begged for any excuse to take a trip (or two, or three) down the aisle.
Historically drawing a large contingent of the young and the restless, this year's crowd seemed to skew older and wiser. The change in venue from J. Verno Studios to the cavernous Power Center made it difficult to capture that effortlessly energetic, breezy and NYC-esque vibe that this ticket is known for. Still, 300-plus were glued to their seats for a show that — judging by the crowd reaction — was a collection of must-haves.
Spotted were honorary chairs Chuck Snyder and Carol Shriber, PFQ director Mary Mitchell, Grove Demming, fashion coordinator Tori Mistick, Jen Castellano and Philip Ferland.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.