Cannon Ball shows city's support for veterans
“It's probably the most aggressively pro-veteran city. It's really a positive place,” said Sgt. Maj. Mark Baylis as he surveyed a crowd of 325 at Soldiers & Sailors Memorial Hall.
Pittsburgh has been receiving kudos for its strong support of our armed forces. The active-duty and veteran members making the rounds during the annual Cannon Ball added to the spotlighted attention.
“As a veteran, it means a great deal,” said Gene Pash (with Karen). “We Vietnam veterans make sure the new veterans are warmly welcomed. It's our duty.”
Leading the charge, S&S prez John McCabe mingled with the likes of Dr. Rory Cooper, Col. Charles and Gertrude Booth, Sgt. Robert Barnes, Lt. Col. Andy and Tricia Loeb, Col. Bernard and Cara Lindstrom, Atiya Abdelmalik and Tim Johnson, Sgt. Maj. Michael Vano with Julie Andrews and museum curator Michael Kraus during a VIP reception on the stage of the auditorium.
Once honorary committee co-chairmen and 2013 Friend & Patriot of the Year recipients Rocky Bleier and Andy Russell, both veteran Steelers as well as veterans of the army, made their entrance, the waters parted long enough to accommodate their arrival before allowing for elbow-room only maneuvering. Meanwhile, guests toured the museum and got up-close and personal with living memorials before a performance by the Hall's 6th Regiment United States Colored Troops Drum Corps signaled the start of dinner in the ballroom.
Proceeds from the Nov. 16 ball will benefit the Soldiers & Sailors Memorial Hall & Museum Trust's veterans programs as well as an impending building renovation.
“Our mission is to remember and honor all veterans from all branches,” McCabe said.
Kate Benz is the social columnist for Trib Total Media and can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 412-380-8515.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.