Roaring Twenties theme gets revelers into their 'Downton' duds
“It's all about the 1920s now, between ‘Gatsby' and ‘Boardwalk Empire' and ‘Downton Abbey',” said Child Health Association of Sewickley board prexy Elisa DiTommaso. “Besides, this is our 90th anniversary. We're going back to our roots.”
It was hard to find anyone in this crowd of 150-plus that wasn't embracing the idea of going back in time during the CHA-CHA Club Speakeasy at the Edgeworth Club, opting out of the requisite formalwear for ensembles that epitomized the Roaring Twenties.
“I actually ordered one online, but when it came, it was an ‘Avatar' costume and I was in a panic,” said Connie Wendzicki, who credited Costume World in the Strip District for the save.
Even the gents weren't immune from a desire to up the ante, although some were apparently exploring the idea of keeping various elements of their costumes intact.
“I'm gonna wear them forever now,” said Julian Taylor (with Gina) of his spats. “How often do we get to wear this?”
Eschewing the standard soundtrack for a more authentic ambiance, Mike Koehler was manning an authentic Victrola that played records no more current than those released in 1926, which seemed to be striking the right chord with everyone.
Also striking quite the chord was a silent-auction offering of epic proportions — a $2K Bar in a Barrel, enough for just about anyone to survive the holidays.
Among the crowd were Bev and Larry Zamer, Kaisa Hall, Peggy and Philip Bowles, Lee and Merri Corbett, John and Nancy Bunce, Ruth and Ivan Hofmann, Tammy and Mark Kerr, Maria and Fred Raymond, Joni and Tom Kristo, Kristen Stephen and David Saint-Jacques, Robyn and Doug Jones, Tom and Amber Ray, and Oliver and Erika Zeranski.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.