Motif of Carnegie Trees gives nod to 2013 Carnegie International
Chances were slim that you'd find anyone in the crowd at the Carnegie Museum of Art on Dec. 4 who wouldn't dub the annual Carnegie Trees exhibit as the official kickoff of the Christmas holiday.
Six towering trees decorated in a nod to the 2013 Carnegie International exhibit were unveiled for a crowd of 450, with co-chairs Melissa Ferrari and Tara Safar at the helm.
Among a crowd that read like a who's who of Pittsburgh were the tree chairs, including — most impressively — Mernie Berger, who, along with sister Lowrie Ebbert, has been tending to a tree for more than 40 years. Additionally, Carole Kamin, Cynthia Cooley and Suzanne McLaughlin, Nancy Lewis with the Carnegie Library, LauraBeattie with the Frick, and the Society for Contemporary Craft also had their creative prowess on display.
“Everyone from library personnel, their families, friends, neighbors and beyond helped make the paper dolls,” explains Lewis, whose “Imagination Builders” theme included approximately 700 paper dolls made by more than 50 people. “Everyone loved it and embraced it so much,” she adds.
The event, presented flawlessly by the Women's Committee of the CMA, has been a holiday tradition since 1961.
Kate Benz is the social columnist for Trib Total Media and can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 412-380-8515.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.