Film Office party attendees say Pittsburgh is photogenic
By and large, the most talked-about celebrity during the Pittsburgh Film Office's “So You Want to Be in Pictures?” party was the city itself.
“It's an exciting time. Pittsburgh is on the map in terms of feature films,” said Lucas Piatt. “You mix the culture, the architecture and the people, and it's a no-brainer.”
The event, at J. Verno Studios on Jan. 31, is held annually as a pre-game to the film office's Lights! Glamour! Action! Oscar-night party. Heavy hitters — including Pittsburgh Film Office director Dawn Keezer, board chair Russ Streiner, honorary chairs Deb Rice-Johnson and her husband, Blair Johnson, County Executive Rich Fitzgerald, Deb Docherty, Donna Belajac, David and Katy Caliguiri, Tara Rieland, and Sandy andJeffrey Witte — mingled during the VIP hour. Expecting a crowd of 400-plus, the valet line outside around 8 p.m. indicated that the swell of ticket-holders would be arriving fashionably late.
“You so rarely get the opportunity to get glamorous in Pittsburgh, and this is one of those opportunities,” said Eileen French, who arrived with Patrick Jordan.
Apart from the requisite mix and mingle, guests were being lured behind the scenes for some one-on-one camera time of their own, reciting lines from well-known movies that would then be played for all to see during the Oscar-night party on March 2.
Now in its 15th year, the evening marked the event's biggest pull to date in terms of sponsorships.
“It'll probably keep going for 50 years,” said Emilio Cornacchione. “It's only going to get bigger and better.”
Kate Benz is the social columnist for Trib Total Media and can be reached at email@example.com or 412-380-8515.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.