Mardi Gras gala brings in $450K for Epilepsy Foundation
Proving that there actually is something to look forward to in the dead of winter, the Epilepsy Foundation Western/Central Pennsylvania basked in the rays of a Mardi Gras gala that achieved sellout status three months in advance.
“We actually had a waiting list and had to turn people away,” said prexy Judy Painter.
Collectively toasting their decision not to procrastinate, a swell of 700 buzzed inside the Westin's ballroom on March 4. There, an explosion of visual candy hit squarely between the eyes: a formerly lonely ceiling danced with bouncy paper lanterns and 6,000 helium balloons in punchy purple, green and yellow. Tabletops were buried under a sea of swag — masks, feverishly blinking sequined hats, feather boas and, of course, the coveted beads.
“I just got here! I haven't even gotten any yet,” said former Steeler Charlie Batch, laughing, as he and Joey Porter slid in fashionably late.
On cue, master of ceremonies Jim Roddey (enjoying his 14th year at the helm) did his official duty of:
1. Trying to wrangle a crowd clearly in the mood to party.
2. Introducing David andCindy Shapira as king and queen of the gala.
Bucking the tradition of statement-worthy entrances, this year's royalty instead opted for a humble ascent to the throne.
“I'm not really the crown type,” Cindy confessed.
With room-cruising trumping any interest in sitting still, the John Parker Band didn't miss a beat — keeping the night moving to the tune of a record-shattering $450K for the Epilepsy Foundation.
Spotted were local board chairwoman Deb Rice-Johnson, national board chairman Warren Lammert, David and Gabriela Porges, Dr. Freddie and Hilda Fu, Greg Barrett, Laura Schreiner and her son, Casey, Jim Broadhurst, Bill andVivian Benter, Tom Grealish, David and Gina Pferdehirt, and Don andAlana Deane.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.