Attack Theatre's Dirty Ball attendees get creative with attire
There was a spectacle unfolding within an otherwise nondescript warehouse on Jane Street in the South Side the evening of April 12, one that began with a plea to check your coat and shoes and seemed to peak when glasses were no longer necessary for drinking the champagne.
The Dirty Ball, Attack Theatre's shun of the common cocktailer, fulfilled its unofficial mission of providing some supreme people-watching thanks in large part to an entertainingly diverse interpretation of the dress code.
“I didn't get the memo on the outfits,” Gerry Morosco said, pointing to his suit and bow tie while a sea of Spandex and strategically placed swatches of fabric floated by.
Shock value varied wildly for a crowd that ran the gamut. The widespread appeal of not wanting to miss out on any action lured the masses in.
“It's different ... it's out of the norm,” Carolyn Lysey said.
Throughout the night, VIPs looking to take a breather — including board prez Todd Owens, Jared Sadowski, Bill and Vivian Benter, Clyde Jones and Robert Morris, Cindy and Rich Engler, Richard Rauh, Dr. Manny and Deb Reich, Sean Gray, Mark Phillis, and Paul Gitnik and Gene Svrcek — sequestered themselves in Richard Parsakian's Velvet Lounge, which offered enhanced customer service aka a private bar.
Artistic directors Peter Kope and Michele de la Reza led the charge for intermittent Pirates-theme performances. Sam Badger (co-chair with Kesha Pate) left quite the lasting impression by way of a suit coat covered in glitter.
“Look at this! I have gold all over me!” laughed Tracy Weigand (with Ken Kucera).
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.