Kudos to the gents who upped the fashion ante during Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens'Bowties & Butterflies soiree, embracing the obvious theme of the evening and daring to go where some had never gone before.
“This is my first tie of a bow tie — so, like, four hours of watching videos,” said David Pferdehirt (with Gina).
After being greeted with a glass of sangria, guests followed the migration pattern downstairs where the action was unfolding. Debbie Barbarita (with Mike), Kathe Patrinos (with Jim), Stephanie Massaro, and event chairwoman Carol Massaro were tucked into a corner and enjoying the unofficial entertainment of Sam Badger. Meanwhile, Michael Herald was spied arriving with his mom, Donna, on his arm and a fashion statement around his neck.
“I'm rockin' the bow ties — somebody's got to bring it back!” he laughed.
Once it was clear that one-half of the evening's theme had been accounted for, a few intrepid explorers took a breather from the party and made their way back upstairs in search of the Butterfly Forrest. Alas, most of the winged beauties were keeping a low profile, although that didn't stop people from lingering awhile with the hope of spotting one.
“People ask when the butterflies are coming all year long,” said Phipps' Adam Haas of the popular exhibit that runs through September.
Among the crowd were executive director Richard Piacentini, Bill Strickland, Bob and Barb Pachevis with their daughter, Tanner, Elin Roddey, Ranny andJay Ferguson, county executive Rich Fitzgerald, Dan and Carole Kamin, Dr.Jeanne DeMoss, Mernie Berger, Bill andVivian Benter, Janera Solomon andJeremy Resnick, Erik Wagner andJune Yonas, and city councilman Dan Gilman.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.