The Cosmo Effect: August Wilson Center fills up for Cosmopolitan Pittsburgh
With a rumor swirling that Hollywood starlet Rachel McAdams had requested entree, a slew of pinball machines provoking a nostalgic swoon and a crowd that ran the gamut from ball gown to blue jeans, Cosmopolitan Pittsburgh began running full tilt at an hour when most parties are just starting to settle down.
“I hate to say it's cosmopolitan, but it is!” said Katherine Leech Vollen, who co-chaired Pittsburgh Cultural Trust's annual Gallery Crawl after-party with Michael McAllister. “It's young, it's fun, it's the future of Pittsburgh,”
After word got out that registration was being best described as “chaotic,” any lines that had been gingerly toed were now being sprinted over. Among the highlights were some impromptu dance moves on display nowhere near the dance floor that one onlooker dubbed as: “Something akin to what I always imagined you'd see at Studio 54 that you never would have told your mother about.”
Future looking bright, the party began spreading out in distinct pockets around the August Wilson Center. With diehards loitering well past their designated VIP hour and general ticket holders swarming in, the atmosphere managed to go from claustrophobic to wide open spaces in the blink of an eye. People scattered to perch in the lounge area, in and around the dance floor or outside on the patio.
For curious outsiders looking in, the evening allowed for some prime people watching for the likes of Cultural Trust prez Kevin McMahon and his wife, Kristen, Abby Krizner and Joe Madia, Sam Badger, Marc Giosi, Cathy Schodde, and Tracy Weigand and Ken Kucera. Among the host committee were Christy Brodbeck, Shona Byrne, Mark Cibulka, Jeanine Fallon, and Rebecca Rickard.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.