Share This Page

New Pittsburgh Courier honors 50 Men of Excellence Awards

| Sunday, July 27, 2014, 9:00 p.m.
John Altdorfer
New Pittsburgh Courier publisher Rod Doss with honorees Justin and Livingstone Johnson and Eric Springer during the Men of Excellence ceremony at the Fairmont Hotel in Downtown Pittsburgh. July 24, 2014

“I'm always astounded by the nominations that come in,” said New Pittsburgh Courier publisher and editor Rod Doss during the Men of Excellence Awards Reception. “You almost have to say there's something in the water in Pittsburgh.”

Since 2008, the Courier has been honoring men who exemplify personal achievement and community involvement, which this year included J.T. Thomas, Eugene Harris, Nate Mitchell, Bishop Otis Carswell, R. Blaine Jones II, Nate Mitchell, Dr. Chenits Pettigrew, Jr., James Reid and the Hon. Ralph Watson — in total, 50 of the city's finest.

With a crowd of 300 guests filing into the Fairmont on July 24, the event also recognized brothers and Legacy Awardees the Hon. Livingstone Johnson, retired senior judge of the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas, and the Hon. Justin Johnson, retired Pennsylvania Superior Court judge.

“He probably deserves it more. He's my baby brother, but he out ranks me,” said Livingstone Johnson.

The siblings were the first-ever dual awardees.

Kate Benz is the social columnist for Trib Total Media and can be reached at kbenz@tribweb.com, 412-380-8515 or via Twitter @KateBenzTRIB.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.