Foodies gather at Stage AE to Savor Pittsburgh
The crowd at Savor Pittsburgh: A Celebration of Cuisine carries from inside to outside at Stage AE on the North Shore, as people dine on various dishes from a handful of restaurants, wineries, breweries and distilleries on Thursday, Aug. 21, 2014. The proceeds from the event went to Magee-Womens Research Institute and Foundation towards research on premature births.
Photo by Stephanie Strasburg | Trib Total Media
With more than 20 participating restaurants, the only thing standing in the way of asking for seconds during Savor Pittsburgh was the presence of 1,500 like-minded individuals.
“We're lucky. People really embrace the cause,” said Christina Dickerson.
Benefitting Magee-Womens Research Institute & Foundation, the annual taste test welcomed a sold-out crowd to Stage AE on Aug. 21 that included Scott Lammie, David andGina Pferdehirt, Diane Holder, Bruce and Debbie Horvitz, Mike andDebbie Barbarita, and Leslie Davis and Abe Leizerowski. While No Bad Ju Ju occupied the stage, the eat, drink and be merry was being dished out both inside and on the lawn, allowing for optimal crowd-surfing and far too much temptation.
Now in its ninth year, foundersMichelle and Ricky Kirsop (executive chef for McCormick & Schmick's on the South Side) conceived the idea after moving here from Philadelphia in an effort to unite the community with cuisine.
“It's amazing to see how it's grown,” she said.
Amongthe awards: Braddock's Restaurant snagged the People's Choice while Seviche's Pastrami Duck Taco was crowned Dish of the Year.
The evening raised $100K.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.