A pattern to staying in fashion
Designers, notably Prada and Kenzo, went off on a tangent this fall. They eschewed the floral, abstract and animal prints that have been dominating fashion for several seasons in favor of geometric motifs. Head-to-toe pattern pantsuits paired with clashing accents made a loud statement. Reminiscent of the mod mid-to-late 1960s, they also brought to mind living-room upholstery. How to wear this trend without looking like a couch? Some choices and advice.
• Busy pants are not for everyone, particularly if you're short of stature and wide of hip. For the svelte, J. Crew's patterned brocade capris can update your wardrobe. Play it safe with a black sweater and pumps, or dare to pair them with a print shirt or knit top. If you do, stay within the same color family. $298 at www.net-a-porter.com.
• Asos' check A-line wool-blend midi skirt will show off your gym-whittled waist. Pockets at the hip score practicality points with us. Lengthen your silhouette with a pair of mid-high-heel ankle boots, and balance the power of the checks and the width of the skirt with a slim-fitting denim shirt on top. $88 at www.asos.com.
• A mix of wool, silk, nylon, cotton and spandex, these machine-washable sweater tights warm without overwhelming; the busiest part of the pattern outlines the legs instead of taking center stage. In any case, the art-deco design will punch up a dark-hued pencil skirt or subdue a red mini. Geo tights, $38 at Anthropologie stores and www.anthropologie.com.
• There's something refreshingly simple and clean-cut about a plate with intersecting lines. Use one from Global Table as a base, and layer other, more-complicated prints on it for increased tabletop interest. $16 at www.globaltable.com.
Janet Bennett Kelly is a writer for The Washington Post.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.