ShareThis Page

Curve appeal: Fashion takes note of plus-size women

| Sunday, April 14, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

On a recent shopping trip with my curvy pal J., we spent a fruitless hour and a half in a Nordstrom dressing room hunting for a size 16 cocktail outfit. One lacy tunic flattered her bosom but wouldn't quite fasten in the back; a little black dress that looked OK on the hanger screamed Reform School Matron on her. We eventually gave up and left to get a glass of wine at the food court. But her frustration — and the cash she didn't drop — stuck with me.

After all, every woman (well, maybe not Kate Upton or Demi Moore) struggles to find jeans that fit and bathing suits that give her confidence, not conniptions. But if you're among the estimated 67 percent of U.S. women who wear from size 14 to 34 — aka plus size — shopping for fashionable, flattering clothing can make you feel as lonely as a Tea Partier at a Democratic fundraiser.

“Women's” sections (the other, none-too-flattering moniker for plus) at department stores tend to be relegated to the Siberia of the highest floor. Big-name retailers (J. Crew, Banana Republic) only go up to size 16; some don't even do that (we give you the stink-eye, skinny-loving Zara). And curvier models are conspicuously missing from major-label print ads, though Ralph Lauren recently earned props for using Aussie plus-size babe Robyn Lawley.

“Many designers are surrounded by waif-like models, and they just think of plus-size women as Honey Boo Boo's mom,” says Arlington, Va., government contractor Alexis Benjamin, 31, a size 16. “It's like they think, I'll design a checked tent!”

Indeed, many fashion megawatts (Diane von Furstenberg, Marc Jacobs) don't cut clothes for the zaftig set. And those with extended sizes — Michael Kors, Donna Karan — do little to promote them. “Is it that they don't want fat women associated with their brands?” asks Chicago-based Gabi Gregg, of plus-size blog “It's harder to design and execute a line for curvier girls, but still.”

“The lack of good plus options can be frustrating for consumers,” says Oona McSweeney, vice president of retail and special markets for fashion forecasting firm Stylesight. “But there are realities. A plus-size line requires more fabric, and consumers often aren't willing to pay higher prices for that. It can mean retailers don't want to put their money into plus size.” And cutting a dress for a size 2 and a size 22 means rethinking the entire garment, something some brands aren't interested in.

Still, in the past few years, a surge of far-beyond-skeletal celebrities willing to flaunt their figures (Adele, Rebel Wilson) and style blogs run by voluptuous fashionistas like Gregg do suggest that thin is no longer the only size that's in. Online and on the street, heavier women are willing to take greater risks than in the past.

Gregg, a size 18, famously posted an image of herself in a striped “fatkini” last spring — deep cleavage, non-skinny legs and all. Other bloggers such as the San Francisco area's Tanesha Awasthi of Girl with Curves ( are strutting outfits that once might have seemed off limits for anyone besides Kate Moss — peplum tops and skinny jeans, cropped tees and full skirts. “I think it's about stepping outside your comfort zone and not thinking, ‘That's not for me because I'm curvy,'” Gregg says.

Some brands and entrepreneurs take notice of the lack of plus options and tap into the market's lucrative possibilities. The Limited launched a plus-size line, Eloquii, in 2011. Late last year, 109-year-old retailer Lane Bryant introduced Lane, an upscale division within its plus-size stores. sells luxury styles in sizes 18 to 24 at its e-boutique. “These customers don't want smushy, shapeless knits,' says Jodi Arnold, vice president for design at Eloquii. “Plus-size women want structure, neatness and boldness, too.”

But in larger sizes, there still seems to be a one stilettoed step forward, two loafered steps back situation.

At The Limited in Arlington's Pentagon City mall, Eloquii's Tory Burch-esque print tunics are prettily displayed across the store from similar “straight”-size styles. Yet on a recent shopping trip in Maryland, we found that Saks Fifth Avenue has taken its plus-size Salon Z online only, and Neiman Marcus yielded nothing, though another customer suggested we try Chico's up the street. Ouch!

It felt like a style defeat, but maybe soon, being plus won't be a fashion minus. “Any savvy retailer is discussing how to get these consumers,” McSweeney says. “A groundswell is coming.”

Jennifer Barger is a staff writer for The Washington Post.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.