ShareThis Page

Don't forget to take a scents-ible approach

| Thursday, April 25, 2013, 8:55 p.m.

While sniffing out spring's newest scents and comparing notes with colleagues, we were reminded of the power of fragrance to conjure the past or project an image. One woman chooses a cologne because it smells like an old boyfriend's cigarettes and motorcycle jacket; another picks a bewitching blend of floral and spice to say to the world she's mysterious.

We tested these four eau-so-fragrant perfumes (any one of which is so prettily packaged it would boost the beauty of your boudoir) and are offering our unscientific recommendations.

• A whiff of Jo Malone's Osmanthus Blossom cologne (available May 1) confirms the Brit brand's nose for good scents. The tangy mix of apricot, peach and leather is subtle enough for the office but also will suit those who like to venture outside. 1 fluid ounce is $60 at select department stores and

• Note to Hillary Clinton: While you're contemplating future moves, test out Jimmy Choo's Flash in its disco-ball bottle. The top notes of pink peppercorn infuse the fragrance with energy, while the jasmine and lily notes underneath give it soul. Isn't that just what a signature scent of a would-be president should project? Flash eau de parfum, 3.3 fluid ounces, $98 at Jimmy Choo stores and select department stores.

• Fashion designer Consuelo Castiglioni's Marni is as quirky as her boldly patterned clothing collection of the same name. One sniff makes you want another in this enchanting blend of peppercorns, ginger, cardamom and incense. Marni eau de parfum, 2.2 ounces, $105 at Saks Fifth Avenue stores and

• If the first female director of the Secret Service, Julia Pierson, is on the trail of a new scent, we suggest she begin with a dab of Diptyque's citrusy but unisex L'Eau du Trente Quatre (named for the company's first Paris store on 34 Boulevard Saint Germain). She'll want fellow agents to detect that she's part of the team. 1.7 ounces, $100 at, and

Janet Bennett Kelly is a writer for The Washington Post.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.