Are turtlenecks back for men? Or did they never go away?
By Kim Ode
Published: Thursday, Oct. 31, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
The turtleneck sweater got a little love in recent Wall Street Journal's style pages, which proclaimed that there are “more ways than ever” for men to wear the knit alternative to a shirt-and-tie.
But there are some pros and cons.
Pro: The high neck style “elongates you — it makes your chest all the way to your jawline one continuous look. And it slenderizes the face.”
Con: Beware letting the sweater encounter a five o'clock shadow. “It'll pick and pill it.”
The haberdashers in the luxe confines of Heimie's Haberdashery in downtown St. Paul, Minn., aren't quite ready to commit to turtlenecks being a hot fashion statement.
“But I can tell you this much, we have quite a few men still looking for the turtle,” said Gus Gonzales. “I don't think it's ever gone away. Every gentleman should probably have a turtleneck in his closet.”
Gonzales said turtlenecks are best worn with sports coats and blazers for a casual look, “although I'm also seeing a nice black suit, with a nice heathered gray, lightweight merino turtleneck.”
For the record, Gonzalez said that a proper turtleneck sweater has a collar that extends all the way up a man's neck and then folds over. A mock turtleneck is a single thickness, lacking the fold.
Is it a fashion faux pas to add that they're also warm?
Kim Ode is a staff writer for the Star Tribune (Minneapolis).
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.