Children's wins South Fayette bid
By Tory N. Parrish
Published: Thursday, March 22, 2012
Children's Hospital plans to open a facility in South Fayette in early spring 2014, a UPMC official said on Wednesday night after the township commissioners selected the nonprofit's bid for 2.6 acres of property next to the former Star City Cinema.
The five commissioners unanimously chose Lawrenceville-based Children's Hospital over real estate firm Langholz Wilson Ellis Inc., Downtown, as the winning bidder for the property on Hickory Grade Road.
Children's Hospital plans to build an $18.5 million facility to house pediatric services to be relocated from Bethel Park.
A Langholz subsidiary, 1772 Inc., had planned to build a $7.2 million retail and office development on the site.
Interim township Manager Marshall Bond said that Langholz submitted a bid $1.68 million, while the bid from Children's was $1.65 million.
The commissioners' final decision, however, factored in longer-range benefits for the township, including an offer by Children's Hospital, a tax-exempt entity, to guarantee that 50 percent of the value of its planned four-story, 60,000-square-foot building would be taxable, Bond said.
Bond said the hospital project is expected to generate $30,000 more in revenue for the township over five years than the Langholz project.
Children's pledged to contribute $100,000 to the township's planned $7 million Civic Center.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.