Jolie's news prompts calls to doctors
Actress Angelina Jolie's revelation last week that she had a preventive double mastectomy has struck a nerve with women, many of whom have called doctors to ask about their breast-cancer risk.
Jolie, 37, carries a genetic mutation that increases her risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Her mother died of ovarian cancer at age 56.
Staff at the University of Kansas Cancer Center fielded 50 calls about genetic testing in the 24 hours after Jolie's announcement, five times the usual number in a week, says genetic counselor Jennifer Klemp. Other hospitals contacted by USA Today also reported dozens of calls.
Calls to FORCE, an advocacy group for women with these genetic mutations, quadrupled within 36 hours.
Jolie's announcement was a reminder for women and doctors to look carefully at patients' family histories, says Beth Peshkin, a genetic counselor at Georgetown University's Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center.
“The fact that she took this step is really, really important,” Peshkin says.
But Fran Visco, president of the National Breast Cancer Coalition, notes that women shouldn't rush to be screened. Only one in 500 women carries these mutations, which cause 5 percent to 10 percent of all breast cancers.
Visco says Jolie's story illustrates how little progress has been made against cancer.
“We have invested billions of dollars in science and raising awareness, yet, we have little more than disfiguring and barbaric options to offer women like Ms. Jolie.”
Liz Szabo is a staff writer for USA Today.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- 2 injured in Strip District shooting
- Healthy, confident Steelers LB Shazier ready for full speed ahead
- Shaler man charged with homicide, abuse of corpse in McKeesport woman’s death
- Historic WWII-era landing ship tank docking at Heinz Field
- ATI picketer injured at Harrison mill
- Celebration marks 100 years for South Side Market House
- Man gets probation for sex with teen girl in New Kensington
- New Orleans slow to heal 10 years after Hurricane Katrina
- Norwin athlete formidable in sports, classroom
- LaBar: The upgrade of The Wyatt Family in WWE
- FDA’s revised serving sizes on nutrition labels might backfire as endorsement