ShareThis Page

Mt. Pleasant Area High School class ring — lost for 40 years — returned to owner

| Friday, May 19, 2017, 8:57 p.m.
Shane Dunlap | Tribune-Review
Nick Taxacher (left) was fishing Jacobs Creek at Freeman Falls when he slipped and noticed a ring in the mud. The Mt. Pleasant Area High School class ring belonged to Ed Waugaman who lost the ring decades ago.
Shane Dunlap | Tribune-Review
Ed Waugaman shows the Mt. Pleasant Area High School class ring of 1966 at Jacobs Creek on Thursday, May 18, 2017.

Along with yearbooks and caps and gowns, a class ring is a popular memento for high school graduates.

John Edward Waugaman liked his Mt. Pleasant Area High School Class of 1966 ring so much he wore it regularly for the next 10 years.

Then, sometime around 1977, he believes, the ring disappeared.

The yellow gold ring with the red stone was out of sight and, pretty much, out of mind for 40 years, says Waugaman, 68, of Acme.

Then last month, Nick Taxacher, 26, of Mt. Pleasant Township, went fishing at Jacobs Creek near Freeman Falls, as he often does.

The CSX employee, his dad and his work foreman had a little luck, and then Taxacher walked down a steep, muddy bank.

“On my way back up, I slipped and fell. My face landed right on top of the gemstone,” he says.

Taxacker dug it out and rinsed it in the creek.

“It was still in good condition,” he says.

He could see the class of 1966, Mt. Pleasant Vikings imprint, and read the initials of J.E.W. inside.

Taxacher posted a photo of the ring and its description on his Facebook page.

“It was just a cool idea. I wanted to see if I could track down the owner,” he says.

The photo, and Nick's story, was shared more than 1,700 times. Eventually, Anne Waugaman saw the post and recognized those initials. And she knew her dad has lost his ring.

She reached out to Taxacher online.

“My mom and dad, since their dating days, spent time at the falls,” she says.

Katy and John Waugaman, who goes by Ed, courted in high school and married in 1971. Their home is not far from Waugaman's family's former home, near Freeman Falls.

Soon, Taxacher visited Waugaman, who pulled out his old yearbook.

“I could see it in his face — I was returning a piece of history to him. He was very happy about that,” Taxacher says.

Waugaman suspects he may have left the ring on a blanket while cooling off at the falls with his family 40 years ago.

“Thank goodness I put my initials on it,” he says.

Katy Waugaman, 67, says the family was tickled to learn where Taxacher recovered the ring.

“It brought back a lot of nice memories,” she says.

The two commend Taxacher for his efforts.

“Nick is so excited. He is the sweetest kid. To think he could have sold that . ... We just want Nick to get credit. He was relentless about finding us,” Katy Waugaman says.

On his Facebook page, Taxacher tells the many people who followed the ring's journey that it has arrived safely home.

“This has been the greatest experience I've ever had. (I) have to thank everyone who helped out to make this happen,” he writes.

The Waugamans put the ring in a jewelry box for safekeeping.

And yes, Ed Waugaman says, it still fits.

Mary Pickels is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-836-5401 or or via Twitter @MaryPickels.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.