ShareThis Page
More Lifestyles

Husband's discomfort with confrontation doesn't bode well for his parenting

| Sunday, May 13, 2018, 11:50 p.m.

Adapted from a recent online discussion.

Dear Carolyn:

Thanks so much for your response [to my question in Monday's column]. Unfortunately, my husband won't be the one to [tell his parents to back off]; I've asked him to after I walked away from a conversation before, and he declined, saying he wouldn't be comfortable doing so. He's much, much, much quieter than I am and really hates any type of confrontation/disagreement/verbal unpleasantness; he really does have fantastic qualities that outweigh this fault!

-- Avoiding Questions again

I appreciate this follow-up, thank you.

I am also concerned, looking ahead, about your potentially co-raising a child with someone who “really hates any type of confrontation/disagreement/verbal unpleasantness.”

It sounds as if his parents created this with the same boundary problems you're running into now, but that doesn't mean he's without responsibility. Their damage to him as a child is now his to acknowledge and fix as an adult.

I am completely on board with the idea that different people bring different strengths and weaknesses both to their romantic partnership and their partnership as parents, and often you'll have to pitch in for each other when one is better able to accomplish something than the other.

But being able to express yourself during a difficult or awkward time is not optional -- not in a healthy parent-child relationship. Raising a kid often feels like one difficult or awkward time after another:

“No, you can't stay up late”;

“Where do babies come from? I'm glad you asked, here's how it goes”;

“Yes, your younger brother made the travel team you got cut from, I know you're feeling bad about that”;

“Mr./Ms. School Administrator, this accommodation for my child is required by law and I have the paperwork to support our request.”

So a more retiring co-parent certainly can be, say, the homework explainer and behind-the-scenes calendar keeper while the more outgoing parent takes meetings and makes phone calls -- absolutely. I'm all for it. But the parent job automatically and regularly requires both parents at times to be able to hold their ground under sometimes overwhelming emotional pressure.

Do you know who exploits the gap when one parent won't step up? The kids. And they're on to you younger than you'd ever believe, walking all over the non-confrontational parent at the expense of the spinier one. To the ultimate detriment of the child him- or herself.

Plus: What if, kids or no kids, you end up incapacitated in the hospital and he's the one who has to speak for you. What then?

So it's important for you and any future children that he and “verbal unpleasantness” come to some functional truce.

Mostly, though, he owes it to himself. Handing something of value over to fear is never a confidence builder.

Therefore, it would be absolutely fair for you to make the point that there are times in every marriage where “I wouldn't be comfortable” is not a menu option.

When his mother -- and his ongoing refusal to intervene -- are causing you significant pain? That sounds like one of those times. But that's up to you.

Email Carolyn at tellme@washpost.com, follow her on Facebook at www.facebook.com/carolyn.hax or chat with her online at noon Eastern time each Friday at www.washingtonpost.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me