ShareThis Page
More Lifestyles

Self-made success story meets boyfriend's snobby family

| Wednesday, May 16, 2018, 2:51 p.m.

Adapted from a recent online discussion.

Dear Carolyn:

I grew up poor but worked my way through college and was able to get into a very prestigious law school, so naturally I am used to being around people who come from a very different background than I do. Recently I started working with a man, “Jack,” who went to that same law school. We hit it off immediately and started dating.

Things have been absolutely wonderful -- until I met his extended family at a wedding, that is. His family is old-money rich. His mother has always been nice to me -- his father is dead -- but his aunts, uncles and cousins made it obvious they did not approve of me and made many sly digs about me and my background.

I knew the best way to get through it was to ignore the insults and appear unruffled, but I am not interested in being around them again. I didn't think this would be a problem since Jack sees them at most once a year, but now his mom has invited me to an event that means being around those snobs for an entire long weekend. I'd rather stay home but Jack is asking me to give his family another chance and pointing out that we will be staying with his mom, who is really looking forward to it. My job is super-stressful and I could really use that time off to relax.

What should I do? I need to give an answer soon and I'm really torn.

-- Back Into the Lion's Den?

If anyone has standing to disapprove, it's the person who rose up from nothing on her own merits over people whose biggest whoop-de-doo accomplishment was being born.

I don't encourage going into any situation with this attitude; it's just a different form of snobbery. However, there are benefits to indulging it on a onetime basis. For one, it can help you see “lion's den” is wildly inaccurate; it's more like a toddler's playpen. Mature, thoughtful, decent adults recognize the intellectual underpinnings of snobbery don't withstand even the shallowest scrutiny.

And, it can help because the solution isn't to “appear unruffled,” it's to be unruffled -- and the shortest distance to that state of mind is to understand that people who have to put you down for any reason, but particularly based on your origins -- i.e., something over which you had zero control -- are people who feel insecure enough to need the extra height from stepping on someone's back. It speaks to their character, not yours.

So maybe none of this changes the fact that you regard these people as unpleasant company, but I do think it can help to frame them as unpleasant company more to be pitied than feared.

I also think it's really important to discard this disapproving attitude as soon as it serves its reframing purpose, because if you indulge the thought of them all as a bunch of overprivileged placeholders, then you risk stereotyping them exactly as you feel stereotyped.

And I think going with Jack even though you'd rather stay home and wax your scalp would be a useful step toward seeing whether “absolutely wonderful” really does apply to him.

Besides, the mom is the thing -- if she's cool, then you can do this.

Email Carolyn at tellme@washpost.com, follow her on Facebook at www.facebook.com/carolyn.hax or chat with her online at noon Eastern time each Friday at www.washingtonpost.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me