ShareThis Page
More Lifestyles

Husband thinks wife's self-deprecating humor gives him permission to mock her, too

| Friday, June 8, 2018, 12:24 p.m.

Hi, Carolyn:

Part of my humor -- and my self-defense mechanism -- is to be self-deprecating. I'm getting better about it, as I learned early on that people would use my jokes against me, which never felt good. Plus, I genuinely like myself a lot better with over a decade of therapy under my belt.

I still make fun of myself around my husband, though, and he has started making fun of me right alongside me. Only it doesn't feel good. It feels like a jab.

When I told him this, he pointed out that I was making fun of myself and he was just in on the joke. I decided I would stop with my self-deprecating humor, especially since we have young kids and I wonder how they will develop their sense of self hearing it. But my husband continues to make fun of me. Last night he made fun of my feet yet again (they're big! so what!), then walked by and grabbed my belly fat. When I told him I didn't like that, he again pointed out that I have made fun of myself.

Am I being too sensitive? Can I communicate better that I don't want to be made fun of in that way? I don't mind being made fun of for other things. Just not my body.

-- Self-Deprecating vs. Deprecating

Well, you just communicated this clearly to us. “It feels like a jab.” “I don't mind being made fun of for other things. Just not my body.” “I wonder how [the kids] will develop their sense of self hearing it.” Granted, you apply that to self-deprecation, but isn't the mocking of others even worse?

Any one of these amply explains why you would like your husband to stop. As would this: “Tweaking ourselves and tweaking others are two different things.”

Do you know what else suffices? “Stop.” In its plainest vanilla form.

It means stop, and ignoring “stop” when interacting with others is a message so bad it has the power to jump fences into every other kind of bad there is.

Our reasoning governs our own actions and feelings, not anyone else's. The reasoning your husband has used to defend his right to mock you is that his viewpoint (“I'm only kidding,” “You do the same thing,” “You're being too sensitive,” etc.) is supposed to apply to your feelings: He's kidding so you can't really feel hurt.

No, no, no. That rationale underlies every decision not to stop upon hearing “stop,” and it's toxic.

Meanwhile: You're willing to consider he's right or you're too sensitive. At least, you seem to have chosen not to mount a counterargument to his excuse; maybe you think he's wrong but you aren't sure why?

Please be assured: His logic doesn't work. You're all free to tease with mutual consent, sure. Your making fun of yourself isn't tacit permission for him to make fun of you, though -- it's permission for him to make fun of himself. That's it.

Logically speaking, that is. But here's the thing about feelings: You don't have to be “right” for his jokes to be wrong. His position is that he is entitled to mock you even after you say you don't like it. Is that really the spouse anyone wants to have? Or to be?

Email Carolyn at tellme@washpost.com, follow her on Facebook at www.facebook.com/carolyn.hax or chat with her online at noon Eastern time each Friday at www.washingtonpost.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me