Share This Page

Who picks up the check? Daters face a dilemma when the bill arrives

| Monday, Sept. 16, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Justin Merriman | Tribune-Review
Taylor DiBart, 21, of Uptown, talks about dating to the Tribune Review at Market Square, Downtown on Thursday, August 29, 2013.
Michael McParlane
by Michael McParlane
Justin Merriman | Tribune-Review
Patrick Sweeny, 21, of Uptown, talks about dating to the Tribune Review at Market Square, Downtown on Thursday, August 29, 2013.
Justin Merriman | Tribune-Review
Jordan Saltzman, 19, of Uptown, talks about dating to the Tribune Review at Market Square, Downtown on Thursday, August 29, 2013.

A recent date became awkward when a woman refused to let Patrick Sweeny pay for her meal. She argued with the Uptown resident and even talked to the manager, to stop him from treating.

That's not how it should be, Sweeny says. And there was no second date for this woman. “I always pay,” says Sweeny, 21, a Duquesne University student. “It's just respectful that way.”

Some traditional practices of chivalry still die hard.

Though dating roles have evolved, most women still prefer the man to pay for dates, at least at the beginning of a relationship, according to a recent study presented at the American Sociological Association's annual meeting. Authors of the study — “Who Pays for Dates? Following Versus Challenging Conventional Gender Norms” — surveyed more than 17,000 unmarried heterosexual men and women. Of the respondents, 84 percent of men and 58 percent of women said men pay for most dating expenses, even when the relationship is established rather than beginning. Of the men, 25 percent say they still pay for dates every time.

“They think this is their responsibility,” says study co-author Rosanna Hertz, professor of sociology at Wellesley College in Wellesley, Mass. “This shows that they are gentlemen and good providers.”

Who is paying for dates at first establishes the tone for the relationship, Hertz says: “The date becomes kind of this litmus test for the future.”

Part of the issue of who pays is who does the asking, Hertz says. Also, if a woman makes more money — about 28 percent of women become the household breadwinners, Hertz says — a couple's relationship may be more egalitarian financially.

“This is something that we need to openly discuss more frequently, so it comes as less of an assumption that it's a man's job to pick up the tab.”

Of the women who participated in the study, about a quarter of them pay part of the dating bills from the very beginning. Some 57 percent offer to help pay the tab, but 39 percent confess that they hope their dates will turn down the offer; 44 percent of women said they were put off when men expect them to contribute.

Though traditional norms about paying for dates still dominate beliefs, nearly two-thirds of men in the study say they believe women should contribute, at least at some point. And men seem to resent falling into a perpetual meal-ticket role: If a woman hasn't offered to pay after dating for a while — maybe 3 to 6 months — 44 percent of men say they would break up with her because she may come across as a golddigger.

“Most don't expect to pay 50-50. They just don't want to be out with a princess who won't pay for anything,” Hertz says.

“I think that the men really feel this tension,” she says. “It's not like women are necessarily paying 50-50, but the vast majority said they would like women to open up their pocketbook and at least offer.”

One issue that came up in the study is expectations of physical intimacy. While some women expect chivalry from the beginning of a relationship, for other women, a man's paying produces power dynamics — and one-third of women say that when they pay their own way on a date, they feel less pressure to sleep with a man, Hertz says.

The professor says she was surprised by the results of the study that emphasized traditional norms, in the modern world.

“I would have expected more women to be paying from the very start,” she says.

A sample group of the youngest adults expressed mostly the traditional view of paying for dates: It's the man's responsibility.

“If the guy doesn't pay, it's not a date,” Jordan Saltzman, 19, says. She grew up in Squirrel Hill and now attends Duquesne.

Krisalyn Sorey, 18, once went to a sushi restaurant with a new guy — and was shocked when the bill came, and she paid for her own meal. It was confusing and disappointing, the Uptown resident and Duquesne student says.

Burke Atalay, a Duquesne student from conservative Turkey, says he would not let his girlfriend pay for a date.

“I pay all the time,” Atalay, 20, says.

Jessie Miller, though, says she is “pretty equal,” though she would expect the man to pay at first. After dating someone for several months, she'll want to start paying more of the expenses, says the Duquesne student who lives in Uptown.

Some men — like Taylor DiBart, 21, of the South Side — always will consider paying their responsibility. He has been with his girlfriend, Mikayla Pasterick, for 7 years and 5 months, and he still pays for just about everything — even the rent on their apartment. But DiBart's girlfriend always asks whether she can chip in for the expenses, and he says no.

Some women — like Erin Connelly of Millvale — view dates largely as a 50-50 outing.

“I'm OK with splitting it,” says Connelly, 30. However, 99 percent of men she's dated have refused her offer.

“I wouldn't want to pay for every single meal, and I wouldn't expect someone to pay for my meal,” she says.

Kellie B. Gormly is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at kgormly@tribweb.com or 412-320-7824.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.