Model arena fills void for longtime hockey fan
Like a lot of Pittsburgh hockey fans, Matthew Kitchen went to a playoff game last year and felt a great, empty void where an igloo once stood.
So, he went home and built his own scale model of the Civic/Mellon Arena from scratch.
Well, not totally from scratch.
“I printed out the original blueprints from '58 to '59,” Kitchen says. “Probably went through a thousand or so photos (to determine) what logos were on the boards and scoreboards for as much detail as I could.”
The results are about as close to replicating the original as possible. The model is built mostly from balsa wood, corrugated basswood and poster board. It's supposed to represent the arena in 2010, right down to the Jordan Staal posters on the walls.
Kitchen lives in Manassas, Va., but grew up on Penguins hockey in Punxsutawney.
“My love of Pittsburgh, the arena and the Penguins spans decades,” Kitchen says. “Even with the Consol Energy Center open and attending games there, it still doesn't feel like ‘home' like the Igloo did. I am sure it eventually will, over time.”
Kitchen says he always wanted to become an architect, and did — sort of. He's a network architect, building IT systems. Building something physical, like the model of the Igloo, was a chance to do something different.
“It took around six months to do,” says Kitchen. “That involved coming home in the evening, working on it for two or three hours, more on weekends. I didn't realize it took that amount of time. It had to be exactly perfect. My wife's very happy it's done.”
Michael Machosky is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 412-320-7901.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.