Living with Children: Parent on-track with potty-training
Question: I've been using the method described in your toilet-training book with my 18-month-old daughter, and she's been doing great during the day. She rarely has an accident.
However, I'm still using a diaper at naptime and during the night (waiting for some consistency in dryness before taking that away). Is that correct? The only problem is she's figured out the routine and now poops in her diaper only when I put her down to sleep. She has not gone poop on the potty during the day for several weeks.
Is that cause for concern? I don't want to create a bad habit.
Answer: You (and your daughter, of course) are doing just fine. In fact, you're both doing great and are living proof of the incontrovertible fact that pediatricians (not all, but, certainly, most) have been giving bad toilet-training advice for the past 45 years.
They've been promoting the “child-centered” philosophy that has caused toilet-training to become a huge problem during this same time period. They can be forgiven for believing that the pediatrician responsible for this philo-sophy knew what he was talking about, but it's time for them to begin doing major atonement.
Keep up the good common sense. And, don't become discouraged or anxious if your daughter has a setback now and then.
There will be bumps in the road. In that regard, the fact that she's waiting until naptime or nighttime to poop is no cause for concern. It may take awhile — several months, perhaps — but this will resolve itself. In the meantime, celebrate her success and pay little to no attention to her reticence to use the potty for pooping.
Having said that, there are strategies that might move this process along. One creative parent folded a diaper in the bowl of the potty and told her child that the doctor had said he should poop in his diaper that way.
The child promptly pooped in the diaper-lined potty and continued to do so from that point forward. That's a testament to thinking outside the box if there ever was one.
It's interesting to note that, prior to the 1960s, when everything parenting in America began to go to Hades in a hand basket, parents generally poop-trained before they pee-trained. Also, potty seats were attached to the seat on the big toilet, so when a child was on the potty, he couldn't get off very easily, if at all.
When a child was on schedule to poop, his parents would put him on the potty and walk off. When the child pooped, he called his parents. They'd come in, help him down and clean him off. In other words, on-the-floor potties are part of the problem, because children can get off them at will (but the advantage, of course, is they can also get on them without parent help).
The sorta-kinda good news is that newer (but in my estimation, somewhat less effective) versions of the “old” potties can still be had. I found some on www.diapers.com, for example. You might want to consider that option.
In any case, stay the course. In the final analysis, patience will be the cure.
Family psychologist John Rosemond answers parents' questions at www.parentguru.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Steelers not limiting themselves in free agency
- Big names become available this week via free agency; will Steelers be tempted?
- Under Rutherford, it’s been a sizeable shakeup for Penguins
- Blaze rips through Salem house
- Burnett’s farewell tour wishlist has just 1 item: Pirates World Series
- Winnik impresses Penguins in first workout
- Penguins’ Kunitz makes a dream come true
- ‘Shark Tank’ companies have change of heart
- Faithful stand together in Wilkinsburg
- Tech sector’s stocks strong
- Buffet: Berkshire’s built to last